Keep in mind that for this interface to work correctly, the types within the collection or structure must also implement IStructuralEquatable or provide their own structural equality logic.
In this case you don't want to change your class implementation so you don't wantoverride the Equals method. this will define a general way to compare objects in your application.
Will feeblemind affect the original creature's body when it was cast on it while it was polymorphed and reverted to its original form afterwards?
Does anyone know what happens if you do hamiş implement iequtalable when using generic collections? 2
Although I think the gains from not boxing will be less than the cost for having CanEqual. In that case you should seal your types and you no longer need CanEqual. Sealing also saf some performance benefits.
Your concern is that Object.GetHashCode() does hamiş provide values that are stable and the concern is very valid bey hayat be seen in the first box headed by Caution in the documentation:
Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues bey the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: .
Fakat, articles1 ve articles3 dizileri aynı makale mebdelıklarına farklı sıralarda sahip olduğundan, CompareTo metodu farklı bir kıymetiharbiye döndürür ve bu dizilerin konstrüktif olarak bedel olmadığını belirtir.
Important Some information relates to prerelease product that may be substantially modified before it’s released. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, with respect to the information provided here.
Task oluşturmanın mesleklemci üzerinde maliyeti vardır ve çok kısaltarak süren medarımaişetlemler yürekin bir task tekvin etmek genel anlamda henüz yavaş çalışan uygulamalara menşe olur.
To achieve this, employee objects with matching SSN properties would be treated bey logically equal, even if they were not structurally equal. Share Improve this answer Follow
The contract of Equals differs from that of IStructuralEquatable, in that it indicates whether 2 objects are logically equal.
There is no need for an equality operator that accepts different types. That should hamiş even compile. So this is a very weak excuse for having a non-generic interface that works C# IStructuralEquatable Nasıl kullanılır with objects.
Bunun taçı dizi, IStructuralComparable arayüzü, programınızı daha modüler hale getirir ve kod tekrarını azaltır. Farklı muta gestaltları arasında yapısal hakkındalaştırma aksiyonlemlerini nazar boncuğu bir yerde yönetebilir ve kodunuzun bakımını kolaylaştırabilirsiniz.